Film analysis on the movie “ the hate you give “ -900 words -7 paragraphs •Intro:introduce the movie and the 3 criteria;present your subject. Reviews usually describe the thing they evaluate. Reade


Film analysis on the movie “ the hate you give “

-900 words

-7 paragraphs

  •Intro:introduce the movie and the 3 criteria;present your subject.  Reviews usually describe the thing they evaluate. Readers need necessary background, and summaries can be vital.  However, in the true film reviewer style, try not to give everything away so that the reader may want to see the film.   The introductory paragraph may have a personal, and yet unexamined reaction to the work. It may also have general facts: produced by? Where it was made, actors were? Year it came out, etcetera.

•3 body prographs:

State your criteria and rank them in importance.  Firmly establish your criteria

-examine good and bad points, strengths and weaknesses of a film.

**pick scenes out the movie to represent EACH criteria

***the 3 criteria’s are

•special effects(are the effects used helpful),

•story(how good is the writing,does the protagonist change or grow ,who wrote the original story,is the story complete and satisfying)

•Cinematography(the cinematic director can make or break a project with their use of cameras?how did they employ lightning?are there adequate close up shots or too many

critical evaluation essay is to judge the quality of a work of art in the area of popular entertainment/media and offer reasoned support for your judgment.

3. Compare this film to another project of a similar genre. (See you yesterday may be a option )In this compare/contrast you may or may not judge which of the two was a better work

4. Refute your opposition.  Through interviews or other reviews, find  at least one criticism that you agree with and another you disagree with, and explain why. Bring in a quote from each of these critics.** rotten tomatoes is A good website

5.conclusion

-The key to the success of a critical evaluator (“reviewer”) is to suppress the “fan” or the “hater” in favor of giving the critical, objective thinker a chance to uncover the truth about the quality of a subject.