Nursing And Violence

15% ofpaper

Cited 7 or more sources.

Sources reliable and properlycited.

Sufficient information provided to support all elements oftopic.

Research in­depth, revealing new insights gained.

Cited 5 sources Sourcesreliable.

Less than 3 Citation errors

Sufficient information provided

Clear organization of main points and ideas.

Cited 3­4 sources more than 3 Citation errors

Most sources reliable Information does interfere with ability of reader to find thesource.

Some information relevant tothesis.

Failed to cite even 3 reliablesources.

Information interferes with ability of reader to understand paper.

30% ofpaper

Topic appropriate fornursing.

Content relevant to purpose of paper contains a clear thesis statement and defines the purpose of the paper.

Support for thesis is complex, complete, & in­ depth.

In text citations are used to support all ideas and statements.

Writing is confident, clearly focused with a strong voice/point ofview.

Establishes and focuses on the purpose of the writing task. Paper is clear and rich in details.

Topic is an appropriate topic nursing.

Contains somewhat clear and concise thesis

Support for thesis sufficient, but lacking in depth or complexity.

missing 1­2 in text citations used to supportstatements.

Writing is purposeful and focused with strong voice/point of view. Focuses on the purpose of the  writing task, though not clearlystated.

Ideas are clear, but some gaps in presentation and reasoning.

Topic is loosely related to nursing. Missing 3 or more in text citations used to support statements   Writingis

extremely limited in communicating knowledge, voice/point ofview.

Does not appropriately respond to the purpose of the writing task. The thesis  ismissing.

Topic unclear and does not pertain to nursing. Missing thesis and does not indicate the purpose of the paper in theintroduction.

Writing is limited in communicating knowledge, voice/point of view. Is confused in the purpose of the writing task. Topic is randomly presented and  difficult tofollow.

10% ofpaper

Writing includes clear and appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction, and conclusion. Ideas well organized and logically presented. All information included.

Transitions, introduction, and conclusion slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness. Clear organization of main ideas and points. Writing includes a good beginning, middle, and end.  with some transitions and  goodclosure

Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity. Discussion not thorough, lacks detail. Writing is confused and loosely organized.

Transitions are weak and closure isineffective

Writing is disorganized and undeveloped with no transitions or closure. Information does not support the topic. Noorganization, transitions, introduction, and  poorconclusion

25% ofpaper

Appropriate punctuation used. Met all style and min/max page requirements Effective and engaging use of word choice to capture imagination and attention.

Professional jargon usedcorrectly.

Use consistent agreement between parts of speech. less than 2 errors  in context such as person, point of view and anthropomorphism

ropomorphism.

Maintains agreement between parts of speech. Uses correct punctuation, capitalization. 2­4 errors in context such as person, point of view and anthropomorphism.

Attempted to meet style and/or min/max page requirements Language is trite, vague, or flat. The reader often asks “what did you mean by this?” Many run­onsor fragments.

Inconsistent agreement between parts of speech. 4­ 6 errors in context such as person, point of view and anthropomorphism.

More than 5 spelling errors.

More than 5 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, ortense.

More than 5 punctuation or capitalizationerrors.

Does not meet style and/or min/max page requirements. Careless or inaccurate word choice which obscures meaning. more than 6 errors in context such as person, point of view andanthropomorphism.

20% ofpaper

21-23pts

All sources properly cited. References used appropriately in paper, no errors in references, correct use of APA style references.

Skillfully edited. APA correct with less than 2 errors and all required formatting present including margins, headings, title page, reference page,etc.

All sources properly cited in both paper andreferences.

References used appropriately but limited.

Very few errors in format or punctuation. APA correct with less than 5 errors and all formattingpresent

Not all sources properly cited in both paper and references. Errors in format or punctuation compromises the ideas of thepaper.

APA style not followed consistently, though coverage and reference page are present. 5­7 APAerrors

Not all sources properly cited in both paper and references.

Errors in reference, errors in APA style for reference.

format or punctuation make ideas unclear. Lacks evidence of editing. Knowledge and use of APA not apparent.

APA format has many errors and presented inconsistently

_